<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Application Verification = Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neohaxor.org/2008/09/16/facebook-application-verification-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neohaxor.org/2008/09/16/facebook-application-verification-fail/</link>
	<description>InfoSec / Critical Thinking / Misc Crap</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.neohaxor.org/2008/09/16/facebook-application-verification-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5291</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neohaxor.org/2008/09/16/facebook-application-verification-fail/#comment-5291</guid>
		<description>Nathan, I am not familiar with the inside procedures of Facebook verification. If that&#039;s true, the only point we can get is that the designer of this verification program doesn&#039;t know security well. As a basic practice for application/web security, every changes need re-verification/check, at least major changes. Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, I am not familiar with the inside procedures of Facebook verification. If that&#8217;s true, the only point we can get is that the designer of this verification program doesn&#8217;t know security well. As a basic practice for application/web security, every changes need re-verification/check, at least major changes. Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
